I guess people's visions of the future differ. Because I'm not like most of the stuff I see in this home. The home automation (life-ware!) thing is viable, the retractable sink is awesome, but the other stuff is not so cool.
1. Do you really need that many digital photo frames? - Wouldn't 3 or less be fine? Since photos are continuously going in a slideshow mode, you'll probably seen a ton of picture than you would see on a static frame. But does anybody ever look at every single photo as it passes? It's just a waste of energy to me, and distracting.
2. What happened to the sun? - Is it me, or is the house really dim? I don't know if it was taken at nightime, but a house in darkness, with a bunch of lights twinkling on and off is nuts. Sunlight bring a natural atmosphere, and makes it feel less stuffy inside.
3. Old furniture? - Ok, I was laughing at this one. Who chose the furniture? Was some of it used from the old Monsanto House? Because I expected the home of the future to be full of IKEA furniture, sleek finishes, touch sensors, and good lighting. Quite the opposite. Ugly clash of furniture from the decades.
4. Tad too many screens? - Isn't the use of screens a bit overdone? First the photo frames, and now the mirror? I'd probably only need a big TV screen, tablet, all-in-one portable (phone, remote, PMP, etc.), and a Surface wall would do fine. I don't see how useful Surface at the dining table would be. People would be playing, instead of eating. Think about the energy costs!
5. Who can afford this? - This looks more like an overdone mansion with all the latest and the greatest technology. It has to cost a fortune to put this in your home. What about people with modest paychecks? Don't they have a future?
Ok, so I'm a complainer. The technology seems nice, but the way it's implemented seems over excessive. Technology is great, but too much of a good thing can make a dependence on this stuff, and make you a couch potato. Not to mention the energy wasted to power all this.